Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Flash is 17.4× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.8 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.00 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.016 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 38.2 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 10 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-06-30 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is 17.4× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 5 ≈ $9,000, Qwen3.8 Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
Claude Sonnet 5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Sonnet 5 vs Command A+Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Sonnet 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Sonnet 5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Sonnet 5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5