Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K2.6

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic
$5.00 / $25.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI
$0.95 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
M
Verdict: Kimi K2.6 is 5.8× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 27). Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Opus 4.8Kimi K2.6
Input price / 1M$5.00$0.95
Output price / 1M$25.00$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$10.00$1.71
Cached input / 1M$0.50$0.16
Context window1M262K
Max output128K236K
Intelligence index41.827
Coding index74.361.8
Providers1122
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-05-272026-04-20
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is 5.8× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K2.6: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 4.8: 1,000,000 tokens. Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 4.8 ≈ $22,500, Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900.

More comparisons

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Opus 4.8 vs Command A+Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 Astra ProKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5