Claude Opus 4.8 vs Command A
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command A is 2.3× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 13.1). Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Command A | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $5.00 | $2.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $25.00 | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $10.00 | $4.38 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 256K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Intelligence index | 41.8 | 13.1 |
| Coding index | 74.3 | 27.8 |
| Providers | 11 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-05-27 | 2025-03-13 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Command A?
Command A is 2.3× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Command A: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Opus 4.8: 1,000,000 tokens. Command A: 256,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 4.8 ≈ $22,500, Command A ≈ $10,000.
More comparisons
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Opus 4.8 vs Command A+Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5