Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 43.5× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $25.00 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $10.00 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | $0.016 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-02-04 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 43.5× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 4.6 ≈ $22,500, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Command A+Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4.7Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProClaude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5