Claude Opus 4.6 vs Command A+
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command A+ is 16.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 4.6 has the larger context window (1M vs 192K).
| Claude Opus 4.6 | Command A+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $25.00 | $1.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $10.00 | $0.60 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | $0.15 |
| Context window | 1M | 192K |
| Max output | 128K | 64K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-02-04 | 2026-09-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Command A+?
Command A+ is 16.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Command A+: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6: 1,000,000 tokens. Command A+: 192,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 4.6 ≈ $22,500, Command A+ ≈ $1,350.
More comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4.7Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProClaude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed