Claude Opus 4.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic
$15.00 / $75.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
X
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 171.4× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
Claude Opus 4.1MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M$15.00$0.14
Output price / 1M$75.00$0.28
Blended price (3:1)$30.00$0.18
Cached input / 1M$1.50$0.0028
Context window200K1M
Max output32K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers—2
Best provider uptime (30m)—99.2%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-08-052026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 171.4× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 4.1: 200,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 4.1 ≈ $67,500, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons

Claude Opus 4.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Opus 4.1 vs Command A+Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 4.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Opus 4.1 vs Grok 4.7Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Opus 4.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProClaude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5