Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic
$10.00 / $50.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 18.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (53.4 vs 33.7).
Claude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$10.00$0.42
Output price / 1M$50.00$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$20.00$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.25$0.085
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index53.433.7
Coding index81.668.1
Providers416
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-012026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is 18.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.1: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.1 ≈ $45,000, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons