Claude Fable 5.1 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic
$10.00 / $50.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
G

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google
$0.50 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
G
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 17.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.1 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Fable 5.1Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Input price / 1M$10.00$0.50
Output price / 1M$50.00$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$20.00$1.13
Cached input / 1M$0.25
Context window1M131K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index53.4
Coding index81.6
Providers42
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-012026-06-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 17.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.1: 1,000,000 tokens. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.1 ≈ $45,000, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ≈ $2,500.

More comparisons