Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.6
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Kimi K2.6 is 11.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (49.6 vs 27). Claude Fable 5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Claude Fable 5 | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.95 |
| Output price / 1M | $50.00 | $4.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $20.00 | $1.71 |
| Cached input / 1M | $1.00 | $0.16 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 49.6 | 27 |
| Coding index | 76.5 | 61.8 |
| Providers | 6 | 22 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-06-09 | 2026-04-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 is 11.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.6: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Fable 5: 1,000,000 tokens. Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5 ≈ $45,000, Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900.
More comparisons
Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Fable 5 vs Command A+Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5