Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.3

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic
$10.00 / $50.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z

GLM 5.3

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.84 / $2.64
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Z
Verdict: GLM 5.3 is 15.5× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (49.6 vs 44.8). GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5GLM 5.3
Input price / 1M$10.00$0.84
Output price / 1M$50.00$2.64
Blended price (3:1)$20.00$1.29
Cached input / 1M$1.00$0.16
Context window1M1.3M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index49.644.8
Coding index76.574.8
Providers634
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-06-092026-08-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3 is 15.5× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.3: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5 ≈ $45,000, GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000.

More comparisons