Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
P

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Prism Ml
$0.075 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Q
P
Verdict: Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 21% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Qwen3.8 Omni FlashTernary Bonsai 2 27B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.075
Output price / 1M$0.47$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.016
Context window1M262K
Max output131K33K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-09-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 21% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ≈ $400.00.

More comparisons