Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Seed 1.6
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 3.0× cheaper than Seed 1.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | Seed 1.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.15 | $0.25 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.47 | $2.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.23 | $0.69 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.016 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2025-12-23 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-11-11 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash or Seed 1.6?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 3.0× cheaper than Seed 1.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Seed 1.6: which has a bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Seed 1.6: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00, Seed 1.6 ≈ $1,500.
More comparisons
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Grok 4.7Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 AstraQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Seed 1.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSeed 1.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSeed 1.6 vs Command A+Seed 1.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProSeed 1.6 vs GPT-6 LunaSeed 1.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProSeed 1.6 vs GPT-6 SolSeed 1.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5