Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.7 Plus is 47% cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 25.2).
| Qwen3.7 Plus | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.32 | $0.42 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.28 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.56 | $1.06 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.064 | $0.085 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 25.2 | 33.7 |
| Coding index | 55.9 | 68.1 |
| Providers | — | 16 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-06-03 | 2026-08-14 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.7 Plus is 47% cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Plus: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3.7 Plus ≈ $1,280, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.
More comparisons
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.7 Plus vs Command A+Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.7 Plus vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedQwen3.7 Plus vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.7Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashQwen3.7 Plus vs GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen3.7 Plus vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 AstraQwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5