o4 Mini High vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: o4 Mini High is 36% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
| o4 Mini High | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.10 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.40 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.93 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.28 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 100K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 45.4 |
| Coding index | — | 76.2 |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-16 | 2026-09-03 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, o4 Mini High or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
o4 Mini High is 36% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
o4 Mini High vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?
o4 Mini High: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: o4 Mini High ≈ $4,400, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
o4 Mini High vs GLM 5.3 Primeo4 Mini High vs Qwen3.8 Max Primeo4 Mini High vs Command A+o4 Mini High vs GPT-6 Luna Proo4 Mini High vs GPT-6 Lunao4 Mini High vs GPT-6 Sol Proo4 Mini High vs GPT-6 Solo4 Mini High vs Claude Opus 5.5o4 Mini High vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedo4 Mini High vs MiMo-V2.6-Flasho4 Mini High vs Grok 4.7o4 Mini High vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flasho4 Mini High vs GLM 5.3 FlashXo4 Mini High vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flasho4 Mini High vs GPT-6 Astrao4 Mini High vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 5.5