o3 vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: o3 is 42% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max Prime has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
| o3 | Qwen3.8 Max Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $4.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $8.00 | $12.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.50 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | $0.50 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 100K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-16 | 2026-09-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, o3 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?
o3 is 42% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
o3 vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?
o3: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: o3 ≈ $8,000, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.
More comparisons
o3 vs GLM 5.3 Primeo3 vs Command A+o3 vs GPT-6 Luna Proo3 vs GPT-6 Lunao3 vs GPT-6 Sol Proo3 vs GPT-6 Solo3 vs Claude Opus 5.5o3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedo3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flasho3 vs Grok 4.7o3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flasho3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXo3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flasho3 vs GPT-6 Astrao3 vs GPT-6 Astra Proo3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed