Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Muse Spark 1.2

Meta
$1.25 / $4.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 47% cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (39.6 vs 33.7). Muse Spark 1.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Muse Spark 1.2Qwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$1.25$0.42
Output price / 1M$4.25$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$2.00$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.15$0.085
Context window1M1M
Max output944K131K
Intelligence index39.633.7
Coding index72.268.1
Providers—16
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-052026-08-14
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is 47% cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Muse Spark 1.2 ≈ $4,625, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons

Muse Spark 1.2 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMuse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMuse Spark 1.2 vs Command A+Muse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMuse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMuse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-6 SolMuse Spark 1.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5Muse Spark 1.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMuse Spark 1.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark 1.2 vs Grok 4.7Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMuse Spark 1.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMuse Spark 1.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-6 AstraMuse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5