MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

MiniMax M3

MiniMax
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: MiniMax M3 is 2.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 29.2). MiniMax M3 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
MiniMax M3Qwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.42
Output price / 1M$1.20$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.52$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.06$0.085
Context window1M1M
Max output512K131K
Intelligence index29.233.7
Coding index58.668.1
Providers1316
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-05-312026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.8 27B?

MiniMax M3 is 2.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3 ≈ $1,200, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons