MiniMax M2.7 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral AI
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
M
Verdict: MiniMax M2.7 is 5.7× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.8 vs 14.2). Mistral Medium 3.5 has the larger context window (262K vs 205K).
MiniMax M2.7Mistral Medium 3.5
Input price / 1M$0.30$1.50
Output price / 1M$1.20$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.52$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.06
Context window205K262K
Max output131K210K
Intelligence index22.814.2
Coding index52.646.9
Providers92
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-03-182026-04-30
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Mistral Medium 3.5?

MiniMax M2.7 is 5.7× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M2.7 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M2.7: 204,800 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M2.7 ≈ $1,200, Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750.

More comparisons