MiniMax M2.7 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Ministral 3 14B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
M
Verdict: Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 2.6× cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.8 vs 6). Ministral 3 14B 2512 has the larger context window (262K vs 205K).
MiniMax M2.7Ministral 3 14B 2512
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.20$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.52$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.06$0.02
Context window205K262K
Max output131K210K
Intelligence index22.86
Coding index52.614.4
Providers93
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-03-182025-12-02
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 2.6× cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M2.7 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M2.7: 204,800 tokens. Ministral 3 14B 2512: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M2.7 ≈ $1,200, Ministral 3 14B 2512 ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons