MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiniMax M2.1 is 5.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 205K).
| MiniMax M2.1 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.20 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.52 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 205K | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 45.4 |
| Coding index | — | 76.2 |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-12-23 | 2026-09-03 |
| Retirement | 2026-10-08 | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
MiniMax M2.1 is 5.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?
MiniMax M2.1: 204,800 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M2.1 ≈ $1,200, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
MiniMax M2.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiniMax M2.1 vs Command A+MiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-6 LunaMiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-6 SolMiniMax M2.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5MiniMax M2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiniMax M2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M2.1 vs Grok 4.7MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiniMax M2.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiniMax M2.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 5.5