MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Xiaomi

$4.35 / $8.70

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.80 / $1.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 6.4× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).

	MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed	Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M	$4.35	$0.80
Output price / 1M	$8.70	$1.00
Blended price (3:1)	$5.44	$0.85
Cached input / 1M	$0.036	$0.40
Context window	1M	128K
Max output	131K	115K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	1	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	No
Released	2026-09-21	2025-02-01
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 6.4× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons