MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.5 is 24% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.14 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.28 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.18 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0028 | $0.016 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 56.8 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
MiMo-V2.5 is 24% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.5 ≈ $420.00, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
MiMo-V2.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.5 vs Command A+MiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.5 vs Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-6 AstraMiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5