Llama Guard 4 12B vs Schematron V2 Turbo

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Schematron V2 Turbo

Inference Net
$0.03 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
I
Verdict: Schematron V2 Turbo is 3.0× cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama Guard 4 12B has the larger context window (164K vs 128K).
Llama Guard 4 12BSchematron V2 Turbo
Input price / 1M$0.18$0.03
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.15
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.06
Cached input / 1M$0.03
Context window164K128K
Max output16K8K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingNoNo
Released2025-04-302026-09-12
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Schematron V2 Turbo?

Schematron V2 Turbo is 3.0× cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Schematron V2 Turbo: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Schematron V2 Turbo: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Schematron V2 Turbo ≈ $135.00.

More comparisons