Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.5-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.5-Flash is 37% cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.5-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Qwen3.5-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.18 | $0.065 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.18 | $0.26 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.18 | $0.11 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2026-02-25 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Qwen3.5-Flash?
Qwen3.5-Flash is 37% cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.5-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.5-Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Qwen3.5-Flash ≈ $260.00.
More comparisons
Llama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLlama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs Grok 4.7Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 AstraLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.5-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.5-Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.5-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.5-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.5-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.5-Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.5-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5