Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.40 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 7.2× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama Guard 4 12B has the larger context window (164K vs 131K).
Llama Guard 4 12BQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.18$0.40
Output price / 1M$0.18$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$1.30
Cached input / 1M
Context window164K131K
Max output16K33K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-04-302025-09-23
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Llama Guard 4 12B is 7.2× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ≈ $2,800.

More comparisons