Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiniMax M2.1
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 2.9× cheaper than MiniMax M2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M2.1 has the larger context window (205K vs 164K).
| Llama Guard 4 12B | MiniMax M2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.18 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.18 | $1.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.18 | $0.52 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.03 |
| Context window | 164K | 205K |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2025-12-23 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-10-08 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or MiniMax M2.1?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 2.9× cheaper than MiniMax M2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiniMax M2.1: which has a bigger context window?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. MiniMax M2.1: 204,800 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, MiniMax M2.1 ≈ $1,200.
More comparisons
Llama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLlama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs Grok 4.7Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 AstraLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiniMax M2.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiniMax M2.1 vs Command A+MiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-6 LunaMiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-6 SolMiniMax M2.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5