Llama Guard 4 12B vs Mercury 2.5
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Mercury 2.5 is 2.7× cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Mercury 2.5 has the larger context window (260K vs 164K).
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.18 | $0.04 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.18 | $0.15 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.18 | $0.0675 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.004 |
| Context window | 164K | 260K |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2026-09-08 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Mercury 2.5?
Mercury 2.5 is 2.7× cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Mercury 2.5: which has a bigger context window?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Mercury 2.5: 260,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Mercury 2.5 ≈ $155.00.
More comparisons
Llama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLlama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs Grok 4.7Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 AstraLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Astra ProMercury 2.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMercury 2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMercury 2.5 vs Command A+Mercury 2.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMercury 2.5 vs GPT-6 LunaMercury 2.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMercury 2.5 vs GPT-6 SolMercury 2.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5