Kimi K2.5 vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 5.0× cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K2.5 has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
| Kimi K2.5 | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.45 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.25 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.90 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.07 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 164K |
| Max output | 236K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 46.8 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-01-27 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 5.0× cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K2.5 vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K2.5: 262,144 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.5 ≈ $2,025, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Kimi K2.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.5 vs Command A+Kimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedKimi K2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashKimi K2.5 vs Grok 4.7Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashKimi K2.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXKimi K2.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 AstraKimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5