Kimi K2.5 vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 6.0× cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
| Kimi K2.5 | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.45 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.25 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.90 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.07 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 236K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 46.8 | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-01-27 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 6.0× cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K2.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K2.5: 262,144 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.5 ≈ $2,025, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Kimi K2.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.5 vs Command A+Kimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedKimi K2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashKimi K2.5 vs Grok 4.7Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashKimi K2.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXKimi K2.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 AstraKimi K2.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5