Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 15% cheaper than Grok Build 0.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.42 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.00 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.25 | $1.06 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.085 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 230K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 33.7 |
| Coding index | 51.5 | 68.1 |
| Providers | 4 | 16 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-05-20 | 2026-08-14 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B is 15% cheaper than Grok Build 0.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?
Grok Build 0.1: 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok Build 0.1 ≈ $3,000, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.
More comparisons
Grok Build 0.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok Build 0.1 vs Command A+Grok Build 0.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok Build 0.1 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok Build 0.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok Build 0.1 vs GPT-6 SolGrok Build 0.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok Build 0.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok Build 0.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok Build 0.1 vs Grok 4.7Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok Build 0.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok Build 0.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok Build 0.1 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok Build 0.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5