Grok 4.6 vs Seed-2.0-Code
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Seed-2.0-Code is 2.7× cheaper than Grok 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.6 has the larger context window (500K vs 262K).
| Grok 4.6 | Seed-2.0-Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | $1.13 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | — |
| Context window | 500K | 262K |
| Max output | 450K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 44.3 | — |
| Coding index | 76.8 | — |
| Providers | 5 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-12 | 2026-08-12 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-11-11 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Seed-2.0-Code?
Seed-2.0-Code is 2.7× cheaper than Grok 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Grok 4.6 vs Seed-2.0-Code: which has a bigger context window?
Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens. Seed-2.0-Code: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.6 ≈ $7,000, Seed-2.0-Code ≈ $2,500.
More comparisons
Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.6 vs Command A+Grok 4.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.6 vs Grok 4.7Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProSeed-2.0-Code vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSeed-2.0-Code vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSeed-2.0-Code vs Command A+Seed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 Luna ProSeed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 LunaSeed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 Sol ProSeed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 SolSeed-2.0-Code vs Claude Opus 5.5