Grok 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Grok 4.6 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (44.3 vs 14.2). Grok 4.6 has the larger context window (500K vs 262K).
| Grok 4.6 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $1.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $7.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | — |
| Context window | 500K | 262K |
| Max output | 450K | 210K |
| Intelligence index | 44.3 | 14.2 |
| Coding index | 76.8 | 46.9 |
| Providers | 5 | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-12 | 2026-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Grok 4.6 and Mistral Medium 3.5 are priced identically.
Grok 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: which has a bigger context window?
Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.6 ≈ $7,000, Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750.
More comparisons
Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.6 vs Command A+Grok 4.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.6 vs Grok 4.7Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProMistral Medium 3.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMistral Medium 3.5 vs Command A+Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 LunaMistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 SolMistral Medium 3.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5