Grok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.5× cheaper than Grok 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.3 vs 38.8). MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 500K).
| Grok 4.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.43 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $0.87 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | $0.54 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.0036 |
| Context window | 500K | 1M |
| Max output | 450K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 38.8 | 46.3 |
| Coding index | 72.4 | — |
| Providers | 4 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-08 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.5× cheaper than Grok 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Grok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: which has a bigger context window?
Grok 4.5: 500,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.5 ≈ $7,000, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ≈ $1,305.
More comparisons
Grok 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.5 vs Command A+Grok 4.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.5 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.5 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.5 vs Grok 4.7Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.5 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5