GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 4.2× cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-5.6 Terra scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (42.1 vs 33.7). GPT-5.6 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| GPT-5.6 Terra | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.42 |
| Output price / 1M | $12.00 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.50 | $1.06 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.085 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 42.1 | 33.7 |
| Coding index | 76.7 | 68.1 |
| Providers | — | 16 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-09 | 2026-08-14 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B is 4.2× cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.6 Terra ≈ $10,000, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.
More comparisons
GPT-5.6 Terra vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5.6 Terra vs Command A+GPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5.6 Terra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5.6 Terra vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-5.6 Terra vs Grok 4.7GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-5.6 Terra vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5.6 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5