GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

O

GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI
$0.20 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.55 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
O
Q
Verdict: GPT-5.6 Luna is 2.9× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (37.3 vs 18.4). GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
GPT-5.6 LunaQwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.55
Output price / 1M$1.20$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$1.29
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.23
Context window1.1M262K
Max output128K236K
Intelligence index37.318.4
Coding index71.448.2
Providers7
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-092026-02-16
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

GPT-5.6 Luna is 2.9× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.6 Luna ≈ $1,000, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ≈ $2,850.

More comparisons