GPT-5.2-Codex vs Grok 4.7

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

O

GPT-5.2-Codex

OpenAI
$1.75 / $14.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

Grok 4.7

xAI
$1.60 / $4.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
O
X
Verdict: Grok 4.7 is 2.0× cheaper than GPT-5.2-Codex on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 400K).
GPT-5.2-CodexGrok 4.7
Input price / 1M$1.75$1.60
Output price / 1M$14.00$4.80
Blended price (3:1)$4.81$2.40
Cached input / 1M$0.17$0.40
Context window400K500K
Max output128K450K
Intelligence index—46.4
Coding index——
Providers—4
Best provider uptime (30m)—99.9%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-01-142026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2-Codex or Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is 2.0× cheaper than GPT-5.2-Codex on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-5.2-Codex: 400,000 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.2-Codex ≈ $10,500, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.

More comparisons

GPT-5.2-Codex vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.2-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5.2-Codex vs Command A+GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5.2-Codex vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5.2-Codex vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5.2-Codex vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5.2-Codex vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-5.2-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5