GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GPT-5 Nano is 40% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 400K).
| GPT-5 Nano | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.05 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.40 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.14 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.005 | $0.016 |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Nano or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
GPT-5 Nano is 40% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5 Nano: 400,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5 Nano ≈ $300.00, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
GPT-5 Nano vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5 Nano vs Command A+GPT-5 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5 Nano vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5 Nano vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5 Nano vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5 Nano vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5 Nano vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5 Nano vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-5 Nano vs Grok 4.7GPT-5 Nano vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5 Nano vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5 Nano vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5 Nano vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5