GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Grok 4.7

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

O

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

OpenAI
$3.00 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

Grok 4.7

xAI
$1.60 / $4.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
O
X
Verdict: Grok 4.7 is 26% cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 16K).
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kGrok 4.7
Input price / 1M$3.00$1.60
Output price / 1M$4.00$4.80
Blended price (3:1)$3.25$2.40
Cached input / 1M—$0.40
Context window16K500K
Max output4K450K
Intelligence index—46.4
Coding index——
Providers—4
Best provider uptime (30m)—99.9%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2023-08-282026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k or Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is 26% cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k: 16,385 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k ≈ $8,000, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.

More comparisons

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Command A+GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GPT-6 SolGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5