GLM 5V Turbo vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 8.3× cheaper than GLM 5V Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 203K).
| GLM 5V Turbo | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.20 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.00 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.90 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.24 | $0.016 |
| Context window | 203K | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 8.3× cheaper than GLM 5V Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5V Turbo vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5V Turbo: 202,752 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5V Turbo ≈ $4,400, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5V Turbo vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5V Turbo vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5V Turbo vs Command A+GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5V Turbo vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5V Turbo vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5V Turbo vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5V Turbo vs Grok 4.7GLM 5V Turbo vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5V Turbo vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5V Turbo vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5