GLM 4.6V vs Ministral 3 8B 2512

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 4.6V

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.30 / $0.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Ministral 3 8B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.15 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
M
Verdict: Ministral 3 8B 2512 is 3.0× cheaper than GLM 4.6V on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ministral 3 8B 2512 has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
GLM 4.6VMinistral 3 8B 2512
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.90$0.15
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.055$0.015
Context window131K262K
Max output33K210K
Intelligence index5.5
Coding index9.7
Providers3
Best provider uptime (30m)98.8%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-12-082025-12-02
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.6V or Ministral 3 8B 2512?

Ministral 3 8B 2512 is 3.0× cheaper than GLM 4.6V on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 4.6V vs Ministral 3 8B 2512: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 4.6V: 131,072 tokens. Ministral 3 8B 2512: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 4.6V ≈ $1,050, Ministral 3 8B 2512 ≈ $375.00.

More comparisons