GLM 4.5V vs Ministral 3 14B 2512
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 4.5× cheaper than GLM 4.5V on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ministral 3 14B 2512 has the larger context window (262K vs 66K).
| GLM 4.5V | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.60 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.80 | $0.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.90 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.11 | $0.02 |
| Context window | 66K | 262K |
| Max output | 16K | 210K |
| Intelligence index | — | 6 |
| Coding index | — | 14.4 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.3% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2025-12-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5V or Ministral 3 14B 2512?
Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 4.5× cheaper than GLM 4.5V on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 4.5V vs Ministral 3 14B 2512: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 4.5V: 65,536 tokens. Ministral 3 14B 2512: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 4.5V ≈ $2,100, Ministral 3 14B 2512 ≈ $500.00.
More comparisons
GLM 4.5V vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 4.5V vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 4.5V vs Command A+GLM 4.5V vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 4.5V vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 4.5V vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 4.5V vs GPT-6 SolGLM 4.5V vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 4.5V vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 4.5V vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 4.5V vs Grok 4.7GLM 4.5V vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 4.5V vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 4.5V vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 4.5V vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 4.5V vs GPT-6 Astra ProMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs Command A+Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs GPT-6 LunaMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs GPT-6 SolMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs Claude Opus 5.5