GLM 4.5 vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 5.6× cheaper than GLM 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama Guard 4 12B has the larger context window (164K vs 131K).
| GLM 4.5 | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.60 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.20 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.00 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.11 | — |
| Context window | 131K | 164K |
| Max output | 98K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2025-07-25 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | 2026-12-31 | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 5.6× cheaper than GLM 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 4.5 vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 4.5: 131,072 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 4.5 ≈ $2,300, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
GLM 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 4.5 vs Command A+GLM 4.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 4.5 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 4.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 4.5 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 4.5 vs Grok 4.7GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 4.5 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 4.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5