Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Google
$0.09 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
M
Verdict: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 5% cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
Gemma 4 26B A4B Llama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M$0.09$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.14$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.05
Context window262K1.3M
Max output236K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index39.38.2
Providers3
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-04-032025-04-05
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Llama 4 Scout?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is 5% cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

Gemma 4 26B A4B : 262,144 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 4 26B A4B ≈ $330.00, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons