Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google
$0.75 / $3.75
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 29% cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (34 vs 33.7). Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Gemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.75$0.42
Output price / 1M$3.75$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$1.50$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.075$0.085
Context window1M1M
Max output66K131K
Intelligence index3433.7
Coding index69.268.1
Providers716
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-212026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is 29% cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 3.6 Flash ≈ $3,375, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons