Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral AI
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
M
Verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 3.5× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.2 vs 14.2). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteMistral Medium 3.5
Input price / 1M$0.30$1.50
Output price / 1M$2.50$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.03
Context window1M262K
Max output66K210K
Intelligence index22.214.2
Coding index49.346.9
Providers82
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-212026-04-30
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 3.5× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Medium 3.5: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ≈ $1,850, Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750.

More comparisons