Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google
$0.50 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 5% cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Qwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.50$0.42
Output price / 1M$3.00$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$1.13$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.085
Context window131K1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index33.7
Coding index68.1
Providers216
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-182026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is 5% cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ≈ $2,500, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons