Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs MiniMax M2.5

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google
$0.50 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax
$0.27 / $1.08
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
M
Verdict: MiniMax M2.5 is 2.4× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M2.5 has the larger context window (205K vs 131K).
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)MiniMax M2.5
Input price / 1M$0.50$0.27
Output price / 1M$3.00$1.08
Blended price (3:1)$1.13$0.47
Cached input / 1M$0.027
Context window131K205K
Max output33K128K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers28
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-182026-02-12
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or MiniMax M2.5?

MiniMax M2.5 is 2.4× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs MiniMax M2.5: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 131,072 tokens. MiniMax M2.5: 204,800 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ≈ $2,500, MiniMax M2.5 ≈ $1,080.

More comparisons