Cydonia 24B V4.1 vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 2.3× cheaper than Cydonia 24B V4.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 131K).
| Cydonia 24B V4.1 | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.35 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | — |
| Context window | 131K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 118K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-09-27 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Cydonia 24B V4.1 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 2.3× cheaper than Cydonia 24B V4.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Cydonia 24B V4.1 vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Cydonia 24B V4.1: 131,072 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Cydonia 24B V4.1 ≈ $850.00, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Cydonia 24B V4.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCydonia 24B V4.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCydonia 24B V4.1 vs Command A+Cydonia 24B V4.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProCydonia 24B V4.1 vs GPT-6 LunaCydonia 24B V4.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProCydonia 24B V4.1 vs GPT-6 SolCydonia 24B V4.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Cydonia 24B V4.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCydonia 24B V4.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCydonia 24B V4.1 vs Grok 4.7Cydonia 24B V4.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCydonia 24B V4.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCydonia 24B V4.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCydonia 24B V4.1 vs GPT-6 AstraCydonia 24B V4.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5