Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Command R7B (12-2024)

Cohere

$0.0375 / $0.15

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)

$2.00 / $6.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Command R7B (12-2024) is 45.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).

	Command R7B (12-2024)	Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M	$0.0375	$2.00
Output price / 1M	$0.15	$6.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.0656	$3.00
Cached input / 1M	—	$0.25
Context window	128K	1M
Max output	4K	131K
Intelligence index	—	45.4
Coding index	—	76.2
Providers	—	1
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	100.0%
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	No	Yes
Tool calling	No	Yes
Released	2024-12-14	2026-09-03
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command R7B (12-2024) or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Command R7B (12-2024) is 45.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command R7B (12-2024) ≈ $150.00, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons