Claude Opus 5.5 vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.05 / $0.08
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
M
Verdict: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 139.1× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Opus 5.5Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.05
Output price / 1M$20.00$0.08
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.0575
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.025
Context window1M131K
Max output128K118K
Intelligence index57.6
Coding index5.4
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222024-07-23
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 139.1× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct ≈ $140.00.

More comparisons